目的 比较腹腔镜前列腺癌根治术(laparoscopic radical prostatectomy,LRP)后发生尿失禁(postprostatectomy incontinence,PPI)与没有发生PPI的患者在尿动力学上的差异,为临床诊疗提供尿动力学依据。方法 对87例LRP术后的患者按术后是否并发PPI分成两组,行尿动力学检查后进行比较分析。结果 PPI组患者术中保留一侧或双侧神经血管束的比例少于非PPI组,且最大尿道闭合压(maximum urethral closure pressure,MUCP)、最大膀胱容量(maximum cystometric capacity,MCC)、排尿时膀胱开口压力和最大逼尿肌压均较非PPI组低。而腹压漏尿点压试验阳性与临床上是否漏尿并不完全相符。多变量回归分析表明,术中保留神经血管束、MUCP和MCC是PPI的相关因素。结论 PPI与LRP术中保留神经血管束、MUCP和MCC独立相关。尿动力学检查能为更精准有效指导临床治疗提供依据。

Objective To compare the urodynamic parameters in men with and without postprostatectomy incontinence(PPI) after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy(LRP). Methods 87 patients of prostatic carcinoma after LRP were divided into two groups according to have PPI or not. After urodynamic study, the data were collected to find the difference. Results Overall, the proportion of preservation of unilateral or bilateral neurovascular bundles(NVBs) during LRP was lower in PPI group than that in non-PPI group. Besides, the patients in PPI group had lower maximum urethral closure pressure (P=0.04), maximum cystometric capacity (P=0.04), detrusor pressure during opening (P=0.02)and maximum detrusor pressure (P<0.001), as compared with those in non-PPI group. In the multivariate logistic regression, the preservation of unilateral or bilateral NVBs, MUCP and MCC were identified as the related factor with PPI. Conclusion PPI is significantly associated with the preservation of unilateral or bilateral NVBs, MUCP and MCC. Urodynamic test can be used to make the treatment for PPI. It will be more accurate and effective in clinical practice.

目的 比较腹腔镜阑尾切除术结合快速康外科(FTS)观念与传统开腹阑尾切除术的疗效差异。方法 回顾分析奉新县人民医院普通外科2001年2月—2003年4月和2010年7月—2013年6月收治的96例阑尾炎患者,随机分为两组,每组各48例,分别为传统开腹手术组(对照组)和腹腔镜阑尾切除术联合FTS组(实验组),检测术前1 d及术后第1 d、第3 d白细胞计数(White blood cell,,WBC)、C-反应蛋白(CRP)、白细胞介素-6(IL-6),同时比较两组术式的手术时间、住院时间、消化功能恢复时间及术后并发症的发生率。结果 实验组与对照组术后第1 d、第3 d外周血WBC、CRP、IL-6均显著高于术前,两组之间相比较差异有统计学意义(P＜0.05);实验组平均手术时间(62±18)min,对照组平均手术时间(55±21)min,两组相比差异无显著性(P＞0.05);实验组平均住院天数为(4.2±1.3)d,对照组平均住院天数为(7.6±1.5)d,两组相比差异有统计学意义(P＜0.05);实验组术后消化功能恢复时间为(23.3±9)h,对照组为(30.5±11)h,两组相比较差异有统计学意义(P＜0.05);实验组未出现术后并发症病例,对照组出现3例切口感染病例,2例粘连性肠梗阻病例,1例盆腔感染病例,两组手术并发症发生情况相比较差异有统计学意义(P＜0.05)。结论 腹腔镜阑尾切除术结合快速康复外科理念,可有效缩短病人住院天数及促进术后恢复,值得临床广泛应用。

Objective To compare laparoscopic appendectomy surgery combined with fast track surgery(FTS)concept and conventional open appendectomy difference in efficacy. Methods To retrospective analysis Fengxin country people's hospital of general surgery from February 2001 to April 2003 and July 2010 to June 2013,a total of 96 cases of appendicitis were randomly divided into two groups,each included 48 cases,namely conventional open appendectomy group(control group)and the laparoscopic appendectomy combined FTS group(experimental group). The changes of white blood cell count(White blood cell,WBC),C-reactive protein(CRP),interleukin-6(IL-6)were detected in the first day before surgery and the 1,3 day after surgery,while the surgical operative time,the length of hospital stay and digestive function recovery, surgical incision pain,and the rate of postoperative complications were compared between the two groups. Results The levels of WBC,CRP, IL-6 at day 1 and day 3 after surgery were significantly higher than before surgery,and there was significant difference between the experimental group and control group(P<0.05). The average operation time of the experimental group and the control group were respectively (62±18)min and (55±21)min,and there was no significant difference(P＞0.05). Meanwhile the average time of hospital stay and digestive function recovery were obviously shorter in the experimental group than in the control group(P＜0.05). There was no postoperative complications in experimental group. There were 3 cases of incision infection and 1 case of intestinal obstruction and 1 pelvic infection in control group. It showed significant difference between the two groups(P<0.05). Conclusion Laparoscopic Appendectomy Surgery combined with fast track surgery,which can effectively shorten patients average time of hospital stay,reduce postoperative complications and promote postoperative recovery. It is worthy in clinical use widely.

目的 研究比较低流量异氟烷与七氟烷麻醉在小儿腹腔镜手术中的麻醉效果。方法 选取在我院进行腹腔镜手术治疗的小儿患者120例作为研究对象,随机分为异氟烷和七氟烷两组,每组各60例,分别采用低流量异氟烷和七氟烷进行麻醉,比较两组患儿的相关麻醉参数,以及入睡、苏醒、拔管时间和不良反应情况。结果 两组患儿的不同时期脉搏氧饱和度、心率、呼气末二氧化碳浓度比较无差异(P＞0.05);七氟烷组患儿的不同时期的平均动脉压具有较强的稳定性,而异氟烷组患儿在诱导期间、手术过程中平均动脉压降低,差异有统计学意义(P＜0.05)。结论 在小儿腹腔镜手术过程,采用低流量七氟烷进行麻醉,可以使手术过程中血流动力学更加稳定,缩短术后拔管时间,减少术后不良反应发生,更易满足小儿腹腔镜手术的麻醉要求。

Objective To investigate efficacy between low flow isoflurane and sevoflurane in pediatric laparoscopic surgery. Methods 120 cases of children underwent laparoscopic surgery in our hospital were randomly divided into two groups. 60 patients in isoflurane group were given low-flow isoflurane anesthesia; 60 patients in sevoflurane group were given low-flow isoflurane anesthesia. Heart rate (HR), mean arterial blood pressure (MAP), pulse oxygen saturation (SpO₂), end-tidal partial pressure of carbon dioxide (EtCO₂) at different period, sleep and awakening time, extubation time, and adverse reactions of two groups were observed. Results Heart rate (HR), pulse oxygen saturation (SpO₂), end-tidal partial pressure of carbon dioxide (EtCO₂) of two groups at different period had no significantly difference (P>0.05). Mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) of two groups at different period had significantly difference (P<0.05). The sleep time and recovery time of two groups had no significant difference (P>0.05). The extubation time of sevoflurane was significantly lower than isoflurane group (P<0.05). The adverse reaction rate of sevoflurane was significantly lower than isoflurane group (P<0.05). Conclusion Low flow isoflurane and sevoflurane can be used in pediatric laparoscopic surgery, and the efficacy of sevoflurane is better.