目的 观察吉西他滨联合萘达铂治疗铂类敏感复发性卵巢癌的近期疗效与不良反应。方法 回顾性分析潍坊市人民医院2013年1月—2014年6月治疗的60例复发性卵巢癌病例,分为吉西他滨联合萘达铂(GN)方案化疗组30例和吉西他滨联合卡铂(GC)方案化疗组30例。GN方案组,吉西他滨1.0 g/m²,d1、8;萘达铂80 mg/m²,d1,21d为1周期;GC方案组,吉西他滨1.0 g/m²,d1、8;卡铂按AUC=5计算,d1,21 d为1周期。结果 GN方案组近期有效率56.0%,GC方案组近期有效率60.0%,两组比较差异无统计学意义(χ² =0.069,P=0.793)。两组最常见的毒性反应均是骨髓抑制,GC组骨髓抑制发生率较GN组骨髓抑制发生率稍高,但两组比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论 两种方案治疗铂类敏感型复发性卵巢癌疗效无统计学差异,GN方案组不良反应较轻。

Objective To evaluate the clinical effect of GN chemotherapy protocol and GC chemotherapy protocol treatment of recurrent ovarian cancers. Methods We retrospectively analyzed the data of 60 patients with recurrent ovarian cancers in our hospital from January 2013 to June 2014. Divided into gemcitabine and nedaplatin (GN)chemotherapy group and Gemcitabine and carboplatin(GC)chemotherapy group, 30 patients in each group.Patients in GP protocol group were given Gemcitabine 1.0 g/m²,d1,8;and naphthalene(80 mg/m²,d1),21d was a period of treatment; Patients in GC protocol group were given gemcitabine 1.0 g/m²,d1,8;and carboplatin AUC=5 by calculation,21d was a period of treatment. Results For patients in GN protocol group,the short term response rate was 56.0%.For patients in GC protocol group,the short term response rate was 60.0%,the difference was not statistically significant(χ²=0.069,P=0.793). Two of the most common toxicities were myelosuppression, incidence of myelosuppression GC was slightly higher than GN, and the difference was not statistically significant. Conclusion The therapeutic effects of two chemotherapy protocols have no statistically significant difference in treatment of platinum sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer. Toxicity of GN group is light.