各位作者、审稿专家:
本刊官方微信服务号新增稿件状态查询服务,无需反复登录投稿系统,微信即可随时查看审稿进度、修回通知、录用结果,稿件更新实时推送提醒,同步接收期刊征稿、学术资讯。
微信搜索关注广州医药杂志服务号 → 点击菜单栏「绑定账号」→ 输入投稿邮箱完成账号关联;请关闭微信消息免打扰,避免遗漏稿件通知。
《广州医药》编辑部
目的 分析高龄呼吸道感染患者病原菌检测结果及耐药性情况,总结高龄呼吸道感染患者抗菌药物的合理用药经验。方法 对我院2018年1月—2020年12月收治的784例高龄呼吸道感染患者痰液标本进行病原菌培养及药敏试验,统计分析检测结果。结果 701株病原菌中,革兰阴性(G-)菌、革兰阳性(G+)菌和真菌分别检出497株、136株和68株,分别占70.90%、19.40%和9.70%。G-菌以肺炎克雷伯菌、铜绿假单胞菌、大肠埃希菌和奇异变形杆菌为主,分别占21.97%(154株)、18.97%(133株)、14.98%(105株)和7.13%(50株),G+菌以金黄色葡萄球菌为主,占11.27%(79株)。G-菌耐药性前五位依次为氨苄西林、哌拉西林、复方磺胺甲噁唑、头孢唑啉和头孢他啶,耐药率依次为95.96%、85.11%、79.88%、77.06%和52.92%。G+菌耐药性前五位依次为青霉素、氨苄西林、红霉素、环丙沙星和复方磺胺甲噁唑,耐药率依次为95.59%、89.71%、84.56%、80.15%和75.00%。结论 高龄呼吸道感染患者病原菌构成以肺炎克雷伯菌、铜绿假单胞菌、大肠埃希菌、奇异变形杆菌和金黄色葡萄球菌为主,G-菌对氨苄西林、哌拉西林、复方磺胺甲噁唑、头孢唑啉和头孢他啶耐药最强,G+菌对青霉素、氨苄西林、红霉素、环丙沙星和复方磺胺甲噁唑最强,且呈多重耐药特征,加强临床耐药性监测有助于指导合理用药。
Objective To analyze the test results and drug resistance of pathogenic bacteria in elderly patients with respiratory tract infections, and summarize the rational use of antibiotics in elderly patients with respiratory tract infections. Methods The sputum samples of 784 elderly patients with respiratory tract infections admitted to our hospital from January 2018 to December 2020 were collected for pathogen culture and drug sensitivity test, and the test results were statistically analyzed. Results Among 701 strains of pathogenic bacteria, 497 strains were Gram-negative (G-) bacteria (70.90%), 136 strains were Gram-positive (G+) bacteria (19.40%) and 68 strains were fungi (9.70%). G-bacteria were mainly Klebsiellapneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Escherichia coli and Proteus mirabilis, accounting for 21.97% (154 strains), 18.97% (133 strains), 14.98% (105 strains) and 7.13% (50 strains). G+bacteria were mainly Staphylococcus aureus, accounting for 11.27% (79 strains). The top five antibiotics which G-bacteria resisted were ampicillin, piperacillin, compound sulfamethoxazole, cefazolin and ceftazidime.The resistance rates were 95.96%, 85.11%, 79.88%, 77.06% and 52.92%,respectively. The top five antibiotics which G+bacteria resisted were penicillin, ampicillin, erythromycin, ciprofloxacin and compound sulfamethoxazole, and the drug resistance rates were 95.59%, 89.71%, 84.56%, 80.15% and 75.00%, respectively. Conclusions The pathogenic bacteria in elderly patients with respiratory tract infections were mainly Klebsiella pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Escherichia coli, Proteus mirabilis and Staphylococcus aureus. G-bacteria resisted ampicillin, piperacillin,compound sulfamethoxazole, cefazolin and ceftazidime the most. G+bacteria were most resistant to penicillin, ampicillin, erythromycin, ciprofloxacin and compound sulfamethoxazole, and were characterized by multi-drug resistance.Enhancing bacterial resistance monitoring helps guiding the rational use of drugs.
目的 分析我院2011—2015年我院儿科住院患者下呼吸道病原菌分布及其耐药性。方法 采用全自动生化鉴定仪对痰标本分离株进行鉴定,用全自动微生物药敏系统和纸片扩散法对病原菌的耐药性进行检测,并用头孢硝噻吩纸片法对β-内酰胺酶进行检测。结果 2011—2015年共分离得到下呼吸道病原菌518株,包括肺炎链球菌(21.62%)、金黄色葡萄球菌(16.99%)、流感嗜血杆菌(14.48%)、肺炎克雷伯菌(11.97%)、大肠埃希菌(8.11%)、卡他莫拉菌(5.41%)、鲍曼不动杆菌(3.86%)和铜绿假单胞菌(3.86%)等。药敏结果显示,肺炎链球菌对克林霉素(90.18%)、红霉素(92.86%)和复方新诺明(87.50%)的耐药率较高,金黄色葡萄球菌则对青霉素G(90.91%)和红霉素(68.18%)有较强耐药性,未发现对万古霉素或利奈唑胺耐药的革兰阳性球菌。流感嗜血杆菌对氨苄西林耐药率为32%,与其β-内酰胺酶阳性率较一致,肺炎克雷伯菌和大肠埃希菌对头孢类药物(17.33%~45.33%)和喹诺酮类药物(34.67%~50.67%)耐药性较高,并发现1株碳青霉烯耐药的肺炎克雷伯菌。结论 本院下呼吸道感染病原菌谱较广,主要包括多种革兰阳性球菌和革兰阴性杆菌,并对多种抗菌药物表现出较强耐药性,临床应注重合理应用相关抗生素,严格防控病原菌的医院感染及传播。
Objective To analyze the antimicrobial resistance and the profile of pathogens from lower respiratory tract infections in pediatric in patients. Methods Sputum bacterial isolates were identified by an automated biochemical identification system. Antimicrobial resistance was detected by an automated drug susceptibility detection system and the disc diffusion method. The β-lactamases was tested by the nitrocefin disc detection method. Results Five hundred and eighteen bacterial pathogens were isolated from sputum samples during 2011-2015, including streptococcus pneumoniae(21.62%), staphylococcus aureus(16.99%), haemophillus influenzae(14.48%), klebsiella pneumoniae(11.97%), escherichia coli(8.11%), moraxelle catarrhalis(3.8%), acinetobacter baumanii(3.86%) and pseudomonas aeruginosa(3.86%). High resistant rates were detected for S. pneumoniae to clindamycin(90.18%), erythromycin(92.86%) and sulfamethoxazole (85.50%), while S. aureus was highly resistant to penicillin G(90.91%) and erythromycin(68.18%). Resistance to vancomycin and linezolid was not detected for gram positive cocci. The resistant rate to ampicillin was 32% for H. influenzae, which was in concordance with the production of β-lactamases. Relatively high resistance was detected for K. pneumoniae and E. coli to cephalosporins and quinolones. A carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae isolate was also detected. Conclusion Multiple bacterial species were isolated from lower respiratory tract infections in our hospital, including different species of gram positive cocci and gram negative bacilli, and these isolates exhibited high resistance to antibiotics tested. The clinical use of antibiotics and hospital infection and transmission of these pathogens should be controlled.