目的 系统评价胰岛素联用α-葡萄糖苷酶抑制剂(AGIs)治疗成人1型糖尿病(T1DM)的疗效和安全性。方法 检索中英文数据库,纳入关于胰岛素联用AGIs治疗成人T1DM患者的随机或非随机对照试验。使用Review Manager 5.3软件进行Meta分析。结果 共纳入10项研究,616例患者。与安慰剂或空白对照相比,在有效性方面,胰岛素联合AGIs可改善成人T1DM患者的糖化血红蛋白;降低平均血糖、空腹血糖和餐后2小时血糖;改善血糖波动情况,包括平均血糖波动幅度和最大血糖波动幅度(均P<0.05)。在安全性方面,AGIs增加总不良反应发生的风险(P<0.05),其中主要是胃肠道不适,但未增加低血糖的发生率和发生次数(均P>0.05)。胰岛素联合AGIs减少了每日胰岛素总剂量(P<0.05),但对体重、甘油三酯和高密度脂蛋白胆固醇无显著影响(均P>0.05)。结论 胰岛素联合AGIs可降低成人T1DM患者的糖化血红蛋白,改善血糖水平和血糖波动情况。AGIs不会增加低血糖的风险,但需重视其不良反应,特别是胃肠道不良反应。

Objective To systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of adding alpha-glucosidase inhibitors (AGIs) to insulin therapy in adult patients with type 1 diabetes (T1DM). Methods Articles about randomized or non-randomized controlled trials of insulin combined with AGIs in adult patients with T1DM were retrieved from Chinese and English database. Meta-analyses were performed by using Review Manager 5.3. Results A total of 616 patients were included from 10 clinical trials. Compared with adding placebo or nothing, in terms of efficacy, the addition of AGIs resulted in decreased HbA1c, mean blood glucose, fasting plasma blood glucose and 2-hour postprandial blood glucose levels (all P<0.05). And this scheme improved the glucose variability including mean amplitude of glycemic excursions and the largest amplitude of glycemic excursions (P<0.05, respectively). As to safety, AGIs increased the risk of total adverse reactions (P<0.05), most of them were gastrointestinal complaints, while the occurrence and the frequency of hypoglycemia were similar (P>0.05, respectively). This scheme could also lead to the reduced total daily insulin dose (P<0.05) but had no significant effect on body weight, triglyceride or cholesterol concentration (P>0.05, respectively). Conclusions The addition of AGIs to insulin therapy in adult patients with T1DM may reduce HbA1c and improve the glucose levels and glucose variability. But total adverse effects especially the gastrointestinal complaints should also be considered in the use of AGIs although it does not increase the risk of hypoglycemia.

目的 评价贝伐单抗联合肝动脉化疗栓塞治疗原发性肝癌的疗效及不良反应。方法 2名评价员通过独立地检索中英文数据库,纳入随机对照研究,其中治疗组为肝动脉灌注贝伐单抗联合肝动脉化疗栓塞组、对照组为单独肝动脉化疗栓塞组,并通过Jadad量表对纳入文献质量进行评分,最后采用Review Manager 5.2软件进行Meta分析。结果 纳入6篇文献,466例病例。结果显示:在疗效方面,治疗组的3、6个月疾病有效率及疾病控制率,12个月的生存率均高于对照组且差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);在安全性方面,两组间关于发热、转氨酶升高、恶心、黑便的发生率之间的比较无统计学意义(P＞0.05)。结论 肝动脉灌注贝伐单抗联合肝动脉化疗栓塞治疗原发性肝癌与单独肝动脉化疗栓塞比较,能有效提高肝癌患者近期及远期疗效,且并不增加不良反应发生率。

Objective To evaluate the efficacy and side effects of bevacizumab combined with thanscatheter artierial chemoembolzation in the treatment of primary liver cancer. Methods Two reviewers collected data about clinical trials that the combination of bevacizumab and thanscatheter artierial chemoembolzation for treatment of primary liver cancer from data bases. Jadad Score and Review Manager 5.2 software were respectively used to assess the quality of included studies and analyze the obtained data. Results Six randomized controlled trials involving 466 patients were included in this paper. The results of the meta-analysis showed that compared with thanscatheter artierial chemoembolzation group alone, bevacizumab combined with thanscatheter artierial chemoembolzation improved the response rate and disease control rate, prolonged 12 month survival rate (P<0.05). As for side effects, there were no statistically different of those about fever, level of transaminase, nausea and melena between two groups(P>0.05). Conclusion Compared with simple thanscatheter artierial chemoembolzation group, and Bevacizumab combined with thanscatheter artierial chemoembolzation group, the later may improve short-term and long-term effects, and side effects were under control.

目的 系统评价手术与保守治疗无骨折脱位型颈脊髓损伤的疗效。方法 应用计算机检索 PubMed、Cochrane Library、EMbase、OVID、CNKI、维普及万方数据库,纳入关于手术及保守治疗无骨折脱位型颈脊髓损伤疗效比较的随机或非随机对照试验。由2名研究人员独立对文献进行筛选、提取和纳入文献评价,采用 Rev-Man 5.3软件对两种治疗的JOA评分、ASIA运动评分、神经功能恢复率、ASIA分级改善进行Meta分析。结果 ①共纳入13 篇研究,共598例患者,手术和保守治疗组分别371例和227例;②Meta分析显示,与保守治疗相比,手术治疗后的JOA评分更高[MD=3.08,95%CI(2.71,3.45),Z=16.29,P<0.000 01];神经功能恢复率更高[MD=15.87,95%CI(9.28,22.46),Z=4.72,P<0.000 01];ASIA分级改善更明显[OR=2.3,95%CI(1.25,4.15),Z=2.76,P=0.006];在ASIA运动评分方面,两者无差异[MD=5.45,95%CI(-7.56,18.47),Z=0.82,P=0.41]。结论 对于无骨折脱位型颈脊髓损伤的患者,手术治疗更有利于患者神经功能的改善。

Objective To systematically assess the clinical efficacy of surgical treatment versus conservative treatment for CSCIWFD from previously clinical investigations. Methods A systematic search of all the studies published was conducted on the PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMbase, OVID, CNKI, VIP and Wanfang databases. Randomized and non-randomized controlled trials that compared between surgical treatment and conservative treatment for CSCIWFD were identified. Two reviewers independently screened the literature according to the inclusive and exclusive criteria, extracted the data, and assessed the quality of included studies. Meta-analyses were performed to assess variables including Japanese Orthopaedic Association scores(JOA), Neurological function recovery rate, ASIA impairment scale grade, ASIA motor scores. Results ①A total of 13 articles were included, involving 598 patients, of which 371 and 227 patients received sugical or conservative treatment. ②The results of the meta-analysis indicated that, compared with conservative group, surgical group has higher JOA scores[MD=3.08,95%CI(2.71,3.45),Z=16.29,P<0.000 01], better Neurological function recovery rate[MD=15.87,95%CI(9.28,22.46),Z=4.72,P<0.000 01], better ASIA impairment scale grade improvement[OR=2.3,95%CI(1.25,4.15),Z=2.76,P=0.006], and there were no significant differences in the ASIA motor scores[MD=5.45,95%CI(-7.56,18.47),Z=0.82,P=0.41]. Conclusion These result suggests that surgical treatment can improve the neurological function more effectively for patients with cervical spinal cord injury without fracture and dislocation.

目的 采用Meta分析系统定量地评价我国高中生与大学生艾滋病健康教育的干预效果,为在学生群体中开展艾滋病健康教育提供科学依据。方法 以“艾滋病”、“健康教育”、“大学生”和“高中生”为主题词和关键词联合检索PubMed、中国知网和万方数据库的相关文献,各数据库检索时间范围限定在2006年1月—2017年6月。对符合纳入排除标准的文献进行质量评价及摘录所需数据,以健康教育前后艾滋病常识得分作为效应值,运用Revman 5.3软件进行Meta分析。结果 共纳入19篇合格文献。Meta分析结果显示,健康教育对中学生与大学生艾滋病常识得分影响的标准均数差(Standard Mean Difference,SMD)=1.17(95% CI=0.88～1.47)。结论 健康教育对提高我国高中生与大学生艾滋病相关知识的知晓有较好的效果。