目的 比较替格瑞洛片与氯吡格雷片在临床住院急性冠状动脉综合征患者使用中的出血风险。方法 选择2016年1月—2016年11月于我院心血管内科住院的264例急性冠状动脉综合征患者。将患者随机分为两组,替格瑞洛组(A组)131例,氯吡格雷组(B组)133例。对两组患者出血情况进行比较。结果 住院期间两组患者均无严重心血管不良事件(MACE),均未见黑便及需要输血的严重出血。轻微出血患者数,A组:17例占13.0%(17/131),B组:3例占2.3%(3/133),A组轻微出血风险高于B组,差异有统计学意义(P＜0.01)。结论 替格瑞洛轻微出血风险发生率高于氯吡格雷,均未见MACE发生及严重出血病例,临床使用中需注意此问题,并建议更多的临床研究出现。

Objective To compare the risk of bleeding between Clopidogrel and Ticagrelor in inpatients with acute coronary syndrome. Methods 264 patients with acute coronary syndrome who were admitted to our hospital from January 2016 to October 2016 were selected. The patients were divided into two groups randomly, 131 cases with taking Ticagrelor tablets and 133 cases with taking Clopidogrel tablets. The risk of bleeding of the two groups were compared. Results There were no serious adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) between two groups. Severe bleeding events were not obsereved in Ticagrelor and Clopidogrel group. The number of cases with mild bleeding were 17 in Ticagrelor group(13%) and 3 in Clopidogrel group (2.3%). The incidence of minor bleeding risk in Ticagrelor group was significantly higher than the Clopidogrel group(P<0.01). Conclusion The incidence of minor bleeding risk in Ticagrelor group was higher than Clopidogrel.There was no MACE occurrence and serious bleeding among two groups. We need to pay more attention to this problem in clinical use, and more clinical research should be proposed.

目的 探讨替罗非班辅助低分子肝素治疗急性冠脉综合征合并妊娠糖尿病的临床疗效及安全性。方法 前瞻性选取本院2012年4月—2015年10月收治的80例急性冠脉综合征合并妊娠糖尿病患者,按随机数字表法分为对照组、实验组,每组40例,实验组采用替罗非班辅助低分子肝素治疗,对照组使用单独低分子肝素治疗方案,比较两组治疗后血浆蛋白-A(PAPP-A)以及超敏C反应蛋白(hs-CRP)水平;比较两组内出血情况以及血小板计数的变化。结果 两组治疗后PAPP-A以及hs-CRP水平均有所下降,实验组下降幅度高于对照组,对比差异有统计学意义(P＜0.05);两组内出血发生率分别为10.0%、40.0%,均无严重出血情况发生,实验组轻度出血3例,中度出血1例,对照组轻度出血10例,中度出血6例,实验组轻中度出血率低于对照组(P＜0.05);两组治疗前血小板计数对比差异无统计学意义(P＞0.05),治疗后实验组血小板计数下降明显,对照组血小板计数无明显变化,两组不同时间点血小板计数差异无统计学意义(P＞0.05)。结论 替罗非班辅助低分子肝素治疗急性冠脉综合征合并妊娠糖尿病患者具有一定的效果,且用药安全性较高。