目的 分析口腔种植修复和常规修复在牙列缺损治疗中的有效性。方法 选定本院2019年1月—2020年12月接诊的120例牙列缺损患者,根据修复治疗方法的不同分组,参照组60例患者采取常规修复治疗,实验组60例患者采取口腔种植修复,比较两组临床疗效、龈沟炎症因子水平、并发症发生率、满意度评分。结果 实验组临床总有效率(96.67%)高于参照组(78.33%),实验组治疗后龈沟TNF-α、IL-8、IL-6因子均低于参照组,实验组并发症发生率(1.67%)低于参照组(13.33%),实验组患者满意度评分均高于参照组,差异均有统计学意义(P＜0.05)。结论 口腔种植修复可有效改善牙列缺损患者语言、咀嚼功能,减轻龈沟炎症反应,减少并发症,提高患者满意度。

Objective To analyze the efficacy of dental implant and conventional repair in the treatment of dentition defects. Methods A total of 120 patients with dentition defects in our hospital from January 2019 to December 2020 were selected and divided into two groups according to different treatment methods. Sixty patients in the control group were treated with conventional repair, and 60 patients in the experimental group were treated with dental implant repair. The clinical efficacy, gingival crevicular inflammatory factors level, complication incidence and satisfaction score of the two groups were compared. Results The clinical efficacy of the experimental group (96.67%) was higher than that of the control group (78.33%), the levels of TNF-α, IL-8 and IL-6 in the gingival sulcus of the experimental group were lower than those of the control group after treatment, the complications incidence of the experimental group (1.67%) was lower than that of the control group (13.33%), and the satisfaction score of the experimental group was higher than that of the control group, the differences were statistically significant (P＜0.05). Conclusion Dental implant repair could effectively improve the language and chewing function of patients with dentition defects, reduce gingival crevicular inflammatory reaction, complications and improve patients' satisfaction.

目的 对比分析二氧化锆全瓷冠与钴铬合金烤瓷冠修复牙体牙列缺损的临床疗效。方法 选择2008年3月以来广东工业大学医院口腔科和江西省萍乡市安源区现代口腔门诊部牙体牙列缺损全冠修复患者150例364颗,随机分为2组,实验组采用二氧化锆全瓷冠75例185颗,对照组采用钴铬合金烤瓷冠75例179颗,修复后随访2年对比观察,结果采用χ²检验分析。结果 两组在修复体完整性、固位、边缘密合度、牙敏感症状、继发龋、邻面接触点、过敏反应方面差异无统计学意义(P＞0.05);但在牙龈状况、龈缘着色、颜色匹配方面差异有统计学意义(P＜0.01)。结论 二氧化锆全瓷冠修复体美学效果和生物相容性优于钴铬合金烤瓷冠。

Objective To compare and analyze the clinical effects of restoring tooth dentition defect by using zirconium dioxide full porcelain crowns and cobalt chromium alloy porcelain crowns. Methods 150 patients with 364 teeth suffering from tooth dentition defect in hospital of guangdong university of technology and modern stomatology clinic in pingxiang since March of 2008 are chosen and randomly divided into two groups. 75 patients with 185 teeth in the experimental group are restored with zirconium dioxide full porcelain crowns and 75 patients with 179 teeth in the control group are restored with cobalt chromium alloy porcelain crowns, which was followed up with 2-year observation. Results There is no statistical significance between the two groups in terms of repair integrity, retention, edge adaptation, tooth sensitivity symptoms, secondary caries, contact points, and allergic reaction(P＞0.05). But statistical significance exists in gingival status, gingival coloration, and color matching(P＜0.01). Conclusion Zirconium dioxide full porcelain crowns are superior to cobalt chromium alloy porcelain crowns in aesthetic effect and biocompatibility.