目的 比较一次性包皮切割缝合器与传统包皮环切术和套扎环包皮环切术的临床应用效果。方法 对我院2016年7月—2016年12月内门诊收治的包皮过长和包茎患者,采用不同手术方法治疗,其手术时间、术中疼痛评分(VAS评分)、术后水肿、疼痛持续时间、以及外观满意度等方面进行对比。结果 在手术时间和外观满意度方面一次性包皮切割缝合器明显优于传统包皮环切术;在术中疼痛评分(VAS评分)、疼痛持续时间和术后水肿方面一次性包皮切割缝合器明显优于套扎环包皮环切术。结论 一次性包皮切割缝合器与两种传统常规手术比较,手术更加简单、方便且安全,术后外观满意度高,值得临床推广。

Objective To compare the effects of circumcision between using a novel disposable suture device and traditional or plastibell procedure. Methods The patients from July 2016 to December 2016 that underwent different ways of circumcision were documented. The operation time, VAS score, postoperative edema, the duration of the pain and appearance of satisfaction were collected and analyzed. Results The suture device group had shorter operation time, better appearance of satisfaction than that of traditional group (P<0.05). Besides, the suture device group had lesser VAS score, shorter duration of the pain and less postoperative edema (P<0.05). Conclusion Compared to traditional or plastibell procedure, a novel disposable suture device circumcision represents convenient, efficient and minimal invasive. It is worth promoting clinically.